A leather portfolio folder and fountain pen on a desk under a brass lamp

Case Studies

How capital isstewarded, in practice.

Case studies for HNI and NRI investors — the objectives, the cross-border challenges, the Jindal approach, and the outcome.

How to read these

A method, shownthrough examples.

Each case study follows the same arc — the investor's objectives, the challenges most relevant to HNIs and NRIs, the strategy we bring to bear, and the outcome.

All three studies below are drawn from actual client mandates, anonymised for confidentiality. In each, the discipline is the same.

Case Study — Client Mandate

Turning an idle $1Minto income and growth.

The client was sitting on a single ~$1M asset that had barely appreciated and paid only ~2% in rent. We recommended exiting and redeploying the same capital across three assets — recovering the entire original income from a fraction of it, and putting the rest to work for yield, currency, and appreciation.

Investor profile
HNI investor
Primary objective
Yield + appreciation
Core markets
Dubai & Gurgaon
Horizon
3 years+
01Investment Objectives
Primary

Rental efficiency

Recover the entire rental income of the original ~$1M asset from just one-third of the capital, by moving into a well-tenanted commercial asset — freeing the rest of the capital to work harder.

Secondary

Yield, currency & growth

Put the remaining two-thirds to work across a dollar-denominated Dubai apartment and a high-growth Gurgaon launch — adding income, a currency tailwind, and capital appreciation.

02Challenges

A static, low-yield asset

The client's ~$1M holding was appreciating by almost nothing and yielding only ~2% in rent — capital concentrated in a single, underperforming position.

The discipline to exit

An estimated 99.9% of investors never review and exit a non-performing asset. The hardest step was the decision to sell and reallocate rather than hold out of inertia.

Redeploying across markets

Replacing one asset with three — commercial, Dubai residential, and a Gurgaon launch — meant selecting each for a distinct role: income, currency-hedged yield, and appreciation.

Cross-border & currency

Structuring the Dubai purchase cleanly while capturing the strength of a dollar-linked asset for a rupee-based investor — turning currency into an advantage, not a risk.

03The Jindal Strategy

The Jindal strategy

Portfolio review, an honest exit call, and a redeployment engineered so each asset does one job well.

  1. 01

    Portfolio review & exit call

    We assessed the static, ~2%-yielding asset against what the same capital could achieve elsewhere, and recommended a full exit — the step most investors avoid.

  2. 02

    Full income from one-third of the capital

    We redeployed just one-third of the proceeds into a well-tenanted commercial asset that, on its own, replaced the entire rental income of the original ~$1M holding.

  3. 03

    Yield, currency & growth with the balance

    With the remaining two-thirds: a dollar-denominated Dubai apartment yielding ~6% — where the currency itself has been appreciating ~4–5% a year against the rupee — and a new-launch Gurgaon apartment on the Dwarka Expressway corridor, secured with only ~30% committed at booking.

  4. 04

    Ongoing review & exit

    We continue to monitor the portfolio and exit any asset that stops performing — the discipline that separated this outcome from a holding left to drift.

04The Outcome

The outcome

1/3 capital
Replaced the full original rent
~6%
Dubai yield, in USD
4–5% p.a.
USD/INR currency tailwind
~2x / 3 yrs
Gurgaon appreciation

The same rent, now from a third of the capital; a Dubai apartment adding ~6% yield in dollars — with the currency appreciating ~4–5% a year against the rupee — and a Gurgaon new-launch that has roughly doubled in three years, secured with only ~30% committed at booking. The same $1M, previously idle, now works across income, currency, and growth.

Based on an actual Jindal Group mandate; figures reflect this client's experience and are not a guarantee of future results. Client identity withheld for confidentiality. All investments carry risk.

Case Study — Client Mandate

AED 20M into AED 60Mon a UAE land JV.

A UAE land parcel valued at AED 100M was available on a five-year payment plan. Rather than fund it outright, we structured a joint venture with a local developer — the investor committed only the 20% down payment, and the project itself funded the rest.

Investor profile
HNI investor
Primary objective
Development upside
Core market
UAE land
Horizon
~3 years
01Investment Objectives
Primary

Capital appreciation

Capture development-led upside on a AED 100M land parcel — targeting a step-change in value as the land is built out and sold, rather than passive appreciation.

Secondary

Capital efficiency

Control the full AED 100M asset with only AED 20M of the investor's capital, using the five-year payment plan and a developer JV so the project funds its own installments.

02Challenges

A large, staged ticket

A AED 100M parcel on a five-year plan meant recurring installments — a commitment few investors want to fund from their own capital over time.

Finding the right partner

The upside depended on a credible local developer willing to enter a joint venture — one able to build, sell, and deliver on the plan's timeline.

Development & sales execution

Turning raw land into sellable product carries build and sales risk; the structure had to protect the investor while the developer executed.

Funding the installments

The plan only works if the remaining installments are met without further capital calls on the investor — cash flow had to come from the project, not the client.

03The Jindal Strategy

The Jindal strategy

Use a payment plan and a developer JV to control a large asset with a small, capped commitment — and let the project pay for itself.

  1. 01

    Secure the land on a payment plan

    We secured a AED 100M parcel on a five-year plan, committing only the 20% down payment — AED 20M — to control the entire asset.

  2. 02

    Structure a developer joint venture

    We brought in a local developer as a JV partner to build out and sell the project, aligning their execution with the investor's return.

  3. 03

    Let the project fund itself

    The remaining installments were met from project sales — not from further investor capital — so the AED 20M commitment stayed capped.

  4. 04

    Exit at the development premium

    As the project sold through, the investor realised the development upside on the original AED 20M within roughly three years.

04The Outcome

The outcome

AED 20M
Committed (20% down)
AED 60M
Returned in ~3 years
200%
Cash-on-cash profit
AED 100M
Asset controlled

By committing only 20% — AED 20M — to control a AED 100M parcel on a five-year plan, and partnering with a local developer who funded the remaining installments from project sales, the investor turned AED 20M into roughly AED 60M in about three years: an AED 40M upside, or a 200% cash-on-cash profit, with no further capital calls.

Based on an actual Jindal Group mandate; figures reflect this client's experience and are not a guarantee of future results. Development and joint-venture investments carry execution risk; targeted returns are not guaranteed. Client identity withheld for confidentiality.

Case Study — Client Mandate

From flat Seattle rentalsto net-positive carry.

A US-based NRI held two rental properties in Seattle worth ~$2M. Post-COVID they had appreciated only ~20% in five years and yielded ~5% — but the mortgage payments roughly cancelled the rent, so the portfolio produced almost no net return. We moved him out of the US and into the Middle East.

Investor profile
US-based NRI
Primary objective
Positive carry + growth
Core markets
Exit US → UAE
Horizon
Multi-year
01Investment Objectives
Primary

Net-positive carry

Move from a portfolio where mortgage payments cancelled out the ~5% rent to assets that pay for themselves — rentals of at least 7% against a 4.5% mortgage, a clearly positive spread.

Secondary

Capital appreciation

Replace ~20% of appreciation over five years in a stalled Seattle market with Middle East assets targeting roughly 15% of upside a year.

02Challenges

Stagnant US assets

Two Seattle rentals worth ~$2M had appreciated only ~20% in five years post-COVID — capital tied up in a market that had stopped working for him.

The mortgage ate the rent

At ~5% gross yield, mortgage servicing roughly matched the rental income — leaving the portfolio close to break-even on cash flow, with little appreciation to compensate.

Exiting cross-border

Selling US property as an NRI and moving the proceeds abroad meant handling tax, timing, and clean repatriation into the next market.

Re-entering a new market

Redeploying into the Middle East required sourcing the right units and financing so the new portfolio delivered both yield and growth from day one.

03The Jindal Strategy

The Jindal strategy

An honest read on the US portfolio, a clean exit, and a redeployment engineered for positive carry and growth.

  1. 01

    Review the US portfolio

    We showed that both appreciation and net yield were minimal — ~20% over five years, with the mortgage cancelling out the ~5% rent — and that the capital could work far harder elsewhere.

  2. 02

    Exit the US investments

    We recommended selling both Seattle properties and freeing the ~$2M, rather than holding assets that were barely moving.

  3. 03

    Redeploy into the Middle East

    We booked two units in the Middle East for him, selected for a target of roughly 15% of appreciation a year in a stronger market.

  4. 04

    Structure for positive carry

    Rentals of at least 7% against a 4.5% mortgage mean the assets more than cover their own financing — net-positive cash flow while they appreciate.

04The Outcome

The outcome

7% min
Rental yield, Middle East
4.5%
Mortgage rate — net positive
~15% p.a.
Target appreciation
2 units
Booked, vs ~20% / 5 yrs before

The client exited two stagnant Seattle properties — roughly 20% appreciation over five years, with mortgage payments cancelling the ~5% rent — and redeployed into two Middle East units targeting ~15% appreciation a year, with rentals of at least 7% against a 4.5% mortgage. For the first time, the portfolio earns net-positive cash flow while it grows.

Based on an actual Jindal Group mandate; figures reflect this client's experience and are not a guarantee of future results. All investments carry risk. Client identity withheld for confidentiality.

Your objectives,structured with care.

Share what your capital should achieve and we will outline how a mandate could be structured — privately, and with no obligation.

Your information is held in strict confidence and never shared.